Infectious Diseases and the Evolution of Cross-Cultural Differences
نویسنده
چکیده
W e’ll begin with a prediction: years from now it will become obvious to observe that cross-cultural differences result substantially from regional differences in the prevalence of infectious diseases. Does that sound presumptuous? Perhaps even preposterous? Maybe. For many readers, our prediction may seem like a provocation that we’ve made up out of thin air. That’s not quite so. The scientific literature has, for years, documented cultural differences that are predicted by the prevalence of pathogens (e.g., Gangestad & Buss, 1993; low, 1990; Quinlan, 2007; Sherman & Billing, 1999). But these findings tend to fly under the radar of the vast majority of social scientists who concern themselves with culture and cultural variation. Why has there been so little attention paid to the potentially profound role that infectious diseases might play in the creation of cross-cultural differences? One reason, perhaps, is that much cultural scholarship (e.g., cultural anthropology, cultural psychology) is concerned primarily with descriptions of cultural differences or with the consequences that these cultural differences have for individual behavior. less attention has been paid to the origins of cultural differences in the first place. another reason may lie in the fact that, in the occasional articles that do link pathogen prevalence to cultural outcomes, those outcomes have been relatively narrow in scope (pertaining specifically to food preparation, for instance, or to mating behavior). These findings may strike readers as interesting curiosities but perhaps not diagnostic of cultural differences more broadly. a third reason may be that there really hasn’t been much reason to expect that infectious diseases should have any sort of wide-ranging impact on culture. Only recently has there emerged a body of theory and research identifying specific psychological mechanisms that are responsive to the perceived threat of infectious diseases and that may play an important role in the construction of many different kinds of cross-cultural differences. With that context in mind, this chapter has three objectives.
منابع مشابه
Prevalence of infectious skin diseases in the central prison of Kerman
Background: Living in colonies and public places may cause increase in infectious diseases. Prisons are places with high-density population. Prisoners don’t persist on moral and social dictum bases and usually have low educational and cultural levels. So they are at high risk of several diseases including contagious skin diseases. Objective: As contagious skin diseases are important for social ...
متن کاملInvestigating Cross-Cultural Differences in the Privacy Regulation and Perception of Crowding (Northern and Kurdish Women in Iran)
This study investigated cross-cultural differences in the privacy regulation and perception of crowding amongtwo Iranian sub-cultures (Kurdish and Northern women).The primary purpose of this study was to examine whether Northern and Kurdish women differed in their desired and achieved levels of privacy in parks. The second purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between the d...
متن کاملCross-Cultural Differences and Pragmatic Transfer in English and Persian Refusals
This study aimed to examine cross-cultural differences in performing refusal of requests between Persian native speakers (PNSs) and English native speakers (ENSs) in terms of the frequency of the semantic formulas. Also examined in this study was whether Persian EFL learners would transfer their L1 refusal patterns into the L2, and if there would be a relation between their proficiency level an...
متن کاملA Comparative Study of English and Persian Advertising Slogans: Linguistic Means through the Sands of Time
This study was a contrastive analysis of the evolution of English and Persian advertising slogans to investigate their similarities/differences in using rhetorical figures, and the evolution in the use of these figures in the slogans of each language. Thus, 800 Persian and English slogans from the last four decades were collected. Lapsanka's framework (2006) including different aspects with som...
متن کاملHas Human Evolution Stopped?
It has been argued that human evolution has stopped because humans now adapt to their environment via cultural evolution and not biological evolution. However, all organisms adapt to their environment, and humans are no exception. Culture defines much of the human environment, so cultural evolution has actually led to adaptive evolution in humans. Examples are given to illustrate the rapid pace...
متن کامل